Luke O’Farrell earlier today     27th May 2007

Preying for Reign

From Eth’ Squad to Death Squad

Ethology is the scientific study of behavior, but not all of the greatest ethologists have been scientists. Musicians and artists don’t have to be good at human ethology, but novelists and playwrights generally do: Shakespeare, Tolstoy and Dickens had a very deep intuitive understanding of our behavior. It’s easy to think of other names to add to that list of great intuitive ethologists, but one might not seem very obvious: Mario Puzo. You might not have heard of him but you’ve certainly heard of his work. He wrote The Godfather (1969), which might be defined as a work of ethno-ethology: it describes the behavior of competing ethnic groups. A lot of the subtlety and complexity of the book was lost when it was made into a film, which is why you should seek out and read the book even if you’ve already seen the film. By doing so, you’ll better understand society not just in America but throughout the West.

The Godfather – the cover of Mario Puzo’s novel

That’s because The Godfather is a study of predator-and-prey. Putting it less kindly, you could call it a study of parasite-and-host. It describes how a small but cohesive and aggressive ethnic group, or ethnos, can prey for profit on a large but uncohesive and unaggressive ethnos. The small ethnos consists of whites from Sicily in southern Europe; the large ethnos consists of whites from Britain, Germany and Scandinavia in northern Europe. Puzo is truly scientific in his detachment and objectivity: he does not pretend that race doesn’t exist and doesn’t matter or that there aren’t big and important differences within races. Sicily was like a small wasps’ nest; America was like a huge hive full of mild-mannered bees. Sicilian wasps did not prosper in Sicily because they were surrounded by other wasps; in America, on the other hand, they could easily steal honey from the mild-mannered bees. Puzo puts it like this in his later book The Last Don (1996):

But he [Domenico Clericuzio] always remembered that a lawless state was the great enemy. And so he loved America. Early on he had been told the famous maxim of American justice, that it was better that a hundred guilty men go free than that one innocent man be punished. Struck almost dumb by the beauty of the concept, he became an ardent patriot... As for the society, the government – patriot though he was – never entered the picture. Don Clericuzio had been born in Sicily, where society and the government were the enemy. (Op. cit., ch. 3)

Don Clericuzio was “struck almost dumb by the beauty of the concept” because he realized that laws designed for northern European bees could easily be outwitted by Sicilian wasps like himself. And so he grows very rich and powerful, preying on a society that his ethnos could never have created by itself. The same is true of the much more famous Don Vito Corleone of The Godfather. The name Corleone, which literally means “lion-heart”, is a good example of Puzo’s sly irony. The Don and his family believe that their courage and daring justify their use of amoral thuggery against the law-abiding:

Like many businessmen of genius he [Vito Corleone] learned that free competition was wasteful, monopoly efficient. And so he set about achieving that monopoly. There were some oil wholesalers in Brooklyn, men of fiery temper, headstrong, not amenable to reason, who refused to recognize the vision of Vito Corleone, even after he had explained everything with the utmost patience. With these men Vito Corleone threw up his hands in despair and sent [his lieutenant] Tessio to set up a headquarters and solve the problem. Warehouses were burned, truckloads of olive-green oil were dumped. One rash man, an arrogant Milanese with more faith in the police than a saint has in Christ, actually went to the authorities with a complaint against his fellow Italians, breaking the ten-century-old law of omertà [silence]. But before the matter could progress any further the wholesaler disappeared, never to be seen again, leaving behind his devoted wife and three children, who, God be thanked, were fully grown and capable of taking over his business and coming to terms with the Genco Pura oil company. (Op. cit., ch. 14)

Note “arrogant Milanese”: Milan is in northern Italy, hundreds of miles from Sicily, and is part of a “band of gold” identified by Charles Murray in his book Human Accomplishment (2003): “80 percent of the significant Europeans grew up in a rather narrow axis running from Naples up the Rhine to Edinburgh.” Sicily is too far south to be included. The Milanese wholesaler’s arrogance consists of believing in the rule of law, which the Sicilian gangster Vito Corleone believes himself superior to. In this instance he’s right, but his homeland demonstrates what happens when large numbers of people think the same. Florence and Venice, in northern Italy, are famous for art and architecture; the Sicilian capital Palermo, in the far south, is famous for violence and crime. Perhaps this dichotomy between productive north and unproductive south has a genetic basis. Either way, many northern Italians would like to break free: looser ties and even secession have been advocated by an Italian party called the Lega Nord, or Northern League.

A map of Italy

Puzo studies these patterns of intra-ethnic conflict in The Godfather, but his ethno-ethological expertise isn’t confined to Italians. His books comment on the behavior of other ethnic groups too – and many people will not like what they read:

The Don of Detroit, more friendly to Corleone than any of the others, also now spoke against his friend’s position, in the interest of reasonableness. “There’s more money in drugs. It’s getting bigger all the time. There’s no way to stop it so we have to control the business and keep it respectable. I don’t want any of it near schools, I don’t want any of it sold to children. That is an infamità [an infamy] . In my city I would try to keep the traffic in the dark people, the colored. They are the best customers, the least troublesome and they are animals anyway. They have no respect for their wives or their families or for themselves. Let them lose their souls with drugs.” (The Godfather, ch. 20)

Neri had never much liked Negroes, and working in Harlem had made him like them even less. They all were on drugs or booze while they let their women work or peddle ass. He didn’t have any use for any of the bastards. (Ibid., ch. 30)

“One other thing,” Cross said. “Was Jim Losey a racist? Did he hate blacks?” Sharkey gave him a look of amused astonishment. “Of course he did. You’re one of those bullshit liberals, right? You think that’s terrible? Just go out and put a year in on the job. You’ll vote to put them all in a zoo.” (The Last Don, ch. 17)

One must be wary, of course, about confusing the opinions of a character with those of the author, but that doesn’t mean an author can’t protect himself by saying through a character what he really thinks himself. Not that Puzo thinks that all blacks or all Sicilians or all WASPs behave in a fixed and unique way. He recognizes what is the truth: that behavior varies within groups. But he doesn’t pretend that enormous variation doesn’t exist between groups. We’ve already seen how he studied the variation between northern and southern Europeans, so let’s look at another inter-ethnic rivalry in The Godfather. Well-trained Heretical fans will, I’m sure, have begun salivating when I talked about a small, unprincipled ethnos using its greater cohesion and aggression to prey on the society created by a larger, law-abiding ethnos. “Another juicy attack on the Jews must be coming up!” you’ll have thought.

Well, it’s been a while coming, but here’s the juicy attack on the Jews. Only it won’t just be me delivering it, because The Godfather also examines the rivalry between Jews and goyim. In fact, I’d describe the novel as positively anti-Semitic: it doesn’t portray Sicilian crooks in a very flattering light, but there’s a certain Satanic grandeur and glamor to their crimes. Its two big Jewish crooks, on the other hand, are neither grand nor glamorous. One of them, a casino-owner in Vegas, is shot dead for underestimating and antagonizing the Corleones; the other, a film producer in Hollywood, makes a specialty of raping pre-pubescent girls. Neither of these crooks is described explicitly as Jewish, but Puzo makes it clear that they are. Here’s the film producer, for example, setting up what will be one of The Godfather’s most notorious scenes:

Woltz said with childish pride, “The greatest racehorse in the world. I bought him in England last year for six hundred grand. I bet even the Russian Czars never paid that much for a single horse. But I’m not going to race him, I’m going to put him to stud. I’m going to build the greatest racing stable this country has ever known.” He stroked the horse’s mane and called out softly, “Khartoum, Khartoum.” There was real love in his voice and the animal responded. Woltz said to Hagen, “I’m a good horseman, you know, and the first time I ever rode I was fifty years old.” He laughed. “Maybe one of my grandmothers in Russia got raped by a Cossack and I got his blood.” He tickled Khartoum’s belly and said with sincere admiration, “Look at that cock on him. I should have such a cock.” (Op. cit., ch. 1)

Puzo is commenting on two Jewish characteristics there: grudge-bearing and lechery. The producer Jack Woltz remembers that his Jewish ancestors suffered in Russia at goyisch hands, but certainly doesn’t believe that those ancestors incited the hostility in any way. Goys exist for the sake of Jews, after all. That’s why Woltz, “aroused now only by very young girls”, will happily commit what Don Corleone calls an infamità: the rape of a “beautiful twelve-year-old blonde” in his private plane. Unsurprisingly, none of that finds its way into the film, but in the book Don Corleone is complicit in Woltz’s future rapes: he doesn’t inform the police or have Woltz shot. No, he merely has the head of Woltz’s horse cut off and placed in the producer’s bed, so that Woltz will allow the Don’s godson Johnny Fontane to star in a come-back movie. Woltz is a “stupid, stupid son of a bitch”, you see: he’s defied the Sicilian Mafia and been shown that, despite being “advisor to the President, head of the biggest movie studio in the world”, he can be murdered whenever the Mafia please.

So he backs down, gives Johnny Fontaine the part he wants, and continues, no doubt, to rape little girls. If you ask why Puzo created such an unsympathetic Jewish character, this passage in the novel may be a clue:

Now Johnny called the author at his New York home to thank him for the great part he had written in his book for him. He flattered the shit out of the guy. Then casually he asked him how he was doing on his next novel and what it was all about. He lit a cigar while the author told him about a specially interesting chapter and then finally said, “Gee, I’d like to read it when you’re finished. How about sending me a copy? Maybe I can get you a good deal for it, better than you got with Woltz.” The eagerness in the author’s voice told him that he had guessed right. Woltz had chiseled the guy, given him peanuts for the book. (Op. cit., ch. 12)

Did Puzo, like so many goyisch writers, get ripped off by Jews early in his career? It seems very possible, and you can see the same bitterness about Hollywood’s treatment of writers in The Last Don. But there aren’t any big bad Jewish characters in that book, which was published in 1996, long after Jew-invented political correctness had taken a stranglehold on the media. The Godfather was published in 1969, when an author could apparently still make sly attacks on Jews so long as he didn’t identify them explicitly as such. Moe Greene, the other big bad Jew in The Godfather, is identified as Jewish by his name and by the fact that “he made his rep as a Murder Incorporated executioner in Brooklyn.” He’s based on a real Jewish gangster called Benjamin “Bugsy” Siegel, who worked for Murder Inc. before moving to Las Vegas to try bullying and strong-arming his way to success in the casino business. But he ran into financial trouble and was murdered by “the Mob.” If he’d been Sicilian, would the Catholic church in his boyhood neighborhood have put up a memorial plaque for him?

I don’t think so. But Siegel wasn’t Sicilian:

In the Bialystoker Synagogue on Manhattan’s Lower East Side, Bugsy Siegel is memorialized by a Yartzheit (remembrance) plaque that marks his death date so mourners can say Kaddish (a memorial prayer) for the anniversary of his passing. (Wikipedia entry for “Bugsy Spiegel”)

Bugsy Siegel’s kaddish plaque in Bialystoker Synagogue, Manhattan

“So he killed a goy or two – is that some kinda crime?”
Benjamin Siegel is remembered by his folk

Bugsy Siegel is remembered by his family

“So he killed a goy or two – is that some kinda crime?”
Benjamin Siegel is remembered by his folks

Trust Jews to commemorate a ruthless crook in a synagogue – and trust Jews to write themselves out of the history of organized crime. Hollywood has churned out countless movies about Italian gangsters and Arab terrorists and corrupt priests, but hasn’t stereotyped Jews as gangsters or terrorists or corrupters, despite constant examples in real life. That’s because, as Puzo recognized in The Godfather, Hollywood is controlled by Jews: the Italian-American Civil Rights League tried to stop the making of The Godfather film, but who’s ever heard of them? They also had the disadvantage that the film’s director and biggest stars were themselves Italian-American. Can you imagine Jewish-“Americans” collaborating on a film that shows Jews in an unflattering light? And if you can, can you imagine the Jewish-“American” Anti-Defamation League not being able to blackmail or bribe them into dropping the film?

But Mario Puzo’s analysis of exo-ethnic predation on a northern European society easily got past the Jew-filter, because the exo-ethnos was Sicilian, not Jewish. In fact, his analysis applies far better to Jews than to Sicilians: Jews have organized crimes on a far bigger, far more successful, and far more corrupting scale than the Sicilians ever did. The Russian Revolution was a Jewish gang taking over an entire country so that it could loot and avenge itself on its traditional enemy: white Christians. If Jews had had their way, the Judeo-communist gang would have looted and avenged itself on white Christians in the rest of Europe and in America too. Look at who gave Stalin the atom bomb, for example: Klaus Fuchs in Britain and Julius and Ethel Rosenberg in America.

And look at what happened when communism collapsed in Russia:

Harvard’s [i.e. Jewish economists’] reckless privatization scheme based on vouchers was so ludicrously (some say cunningly) designed that the Russian government became the controlling shareholder of all enterprise – enterprises that had formerly belonged to all the people undivided, not the government. A second privatization to correct the “error” of government control resulting from the first, not designed but certainly unopposed by the West, amounted to an outright gifting of company shares to the quick and the favored. At the conclusion of the two privatizations seven people controlled 60% of the economy. Some of those seven, and many people associated with them, live today in almost incomprehensible luxury in London, sheltered by British authorities from the Kremlin who’d like to extradite them to face charges in court. Or in Israel, whose banks (which had no money laundering laws until 2000) are stuffed with Russian oligarchical cash. (“Don’t Cry for Boris Yeltsin”,, 4th May 2007)

The ‘Russian’ oligarchs

“Stealing billions from millions – greed is God, goyim!”

Abramovich, Friedman and other “Russian” oligarchs

The “seven people” mentioned above have names like Abramovich and Friedman. Almost all of them are Jews, in other words, who stole money from millions of innocent goyim to make themselves obscenely rich. Except that to Jews there aren’t any “innocent” goyim:  they’re all the descendants of wicked anti-Semites and they should pay for their ancestors’ sins even if they don’t share them. Jews don’t recognize – and don’t allow themselves to recognize – that anti-Semitism can be provoked by their own bad behavior. So the history of relations between God’s Chosen and the goyim has consisted of Jews being persecuted for bad behavior towards goyim, then feeling that being persecuted entitles them to behave badly towards goyim. They also feel it entitles them to pull the strings of goyisch governments for Jewish ends. When one of those Jewish puppet-masters is forced into the daylight, his fellow Jews rush to defend him.

British goyim, for example, have recently watched the über-sleazy “Lord” Levy being portrayed as the innocent and naïve victim of that devious and crooked goy Tony Blair. And okay: Bliar is devious and crooked, but he’s too stupid ever to have made it to the top on his own. Levy, a much more intelligent and forceful man, put him there with money from Jewish businessmen. So Bliar, eternally grateful for his chance to posture on a world-wide stage, has always done what Levy wanted. With typical chutzpah and self-delusion, British Jews are now pretending it’s the other way around. Here’s the steely-eyed and cynical journo Matthew Norman slathering schmaltz on the “Cash for Honours” affair:

‘Lord’ Levy

Meyn Gott, I vos putty in his hands, Matthew!”
Michael Abraham Levy gets his orders for the day

All in all, then, this [Lord Levy] is not a bad man, if an unusually vain one, and you can barely imagine the depth of his distress at being left marooned and isolated in Totteridge, pacing the thick white shagpile as he waits to learn whether he will be prosecuted for carrying out to the letter the fund-raising instructions of the man who appointed him. Each man destroys the thing he loves, said Oscar Wilde, and so it has proved. Mr Mandelson, Alastair Campbell, now Lord Levy... all those on whom Mr Blair lavished his deepest love have seen their reputations annihilated for doing his bidding – and having been left to swing in the wind, they now flit around the outskirts of public life like tragicomic spectres. But the destruction of Lord Levy seems somehow the saddest because he had climbed the furthest, from the single room in Hackney where he spent his earliest years to the kingly and presidential palaces of the world, and has had the most precipitous fall. (The Independent, 25th May 2007)

‘Lord’ Levy

“Putty I vos, on my muzzer’s life!”
Mike Levy gets further orders

It’s laughable to suggest that very tough and intelligent men like Levy, Mandelson and Campbell have been the puppets of an adolescent narcissist like Blair, who must be one of the dimmest prime ministers Britain has ever had. No, the truth about the relationship between Levy and Blair has been obvious for years. I’ve quoted a Daily Mail story about it before, but Matthew Norman’s self-deluding schmaltz brings out the flavor as strongly as ever:

“We were greeted by Jane Hogarth [a New Labour “fundraiser”] and taken to meet Lord Levy. He was like an animated cartoon, with large gestures and an overbearing personality. He discussed donations and how appreciative the party would be, especially Mr Blair. He said he would introduce us to ‘Tony’ and Jack Straw, Alastair Campbell and various others. He said we would have plenty of time with Tony.” Then they [John and Courtney Coventry] witnessed an extraordinary exchange. Lord Levy was taking a call when the Prime Minister walked over to him and started to speak. Courtney said: “Lord Levy held up his hand and said, ‘Not now, Tony,’ and went back to his phone call. The Prime Minister turned to walk away and Lord Levy said, ‘Tony, wait, I need to speak to you.’

L-R: Sleazy ‘Lord’ Levy; Phony Tony Blair

A jubilant Jew and his troubled Toy-Goy:
L-R: Sleazy “Lord” Levy; Phony Tony Blair

“I thought, ‘My God, what a way to talk to a Prime Minister.’ But Mr Blair stood there like a puppet on a string while Levy continued his phone call for at least a couple of minutes. Then he turned to the Prime Minister without apology for keeping him waiting and launched into a conversation about the importance of the evening. Here was the leader of your Government being treated like a child. Jane Hogarth, Lord Levy and Tony Blair all acted like this was normal.” (The Daily Mail, 24th March 2007)

But it is normal for goyisch politicians to follow Jewish orders. The arrogant, overbearing Levy had been arrested not once but twice by March 2007, the second time on the highly serious charge of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Did that stop Britain’s top cop and “Minister of Justice” joining him in support of an unregulated Jewish militia and spy-network?

Spotted, sharing the top table last week at the Jewish Community Security Trust’s annual dinner, our ever-dashing home sec, Dr John Reid; the commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Sir Ian Blair; and St Tony’s bouffant-haired bagman-in-chief, Lord Levy, currently on police bail and at the centre of an ongoing criminal investigation by Sir Ian’s boys into those absurd cash-for-honours allegations. Regrettably, this doubtless convivial encounter obliged Sir Ian, in accordance with police regulations, to inform the Met Police Authority that he had consorted with a person on bail. The shame of it. (The Guardian, 6th March 2007)

The current “New Labour” government is much better described as Jew Labour, but Bliar was a Jewish puppet long before he entered Downing Street, just as Dubya was a Jewish puppet long before he entered the White House. The Kosher Nostra has power and influence on a scale the Cosa Nostra could never dream of. The same basic principles apply – a small unprincipled ethnos is using its cohesion and aggression to prey on the society created by a large uncohesive ethnos – but there isn’t just a difference of scale between Jewish and Sicilian gangsterism. There’s a difference of malevolence too. Jewish and Sicilian gangsters are both eth’ squads, or criminal organizations based on a shared ethnicity, but the Jewish gangsters have become a death squad too. The Cosa Nostra didn’t want to wreck the West, in part because, in their own way, they were part of it: the son of a Sicilian father and mother from northern Italy is described in The Godfather as a “half-breed”, but the Don’s favorite son marries a New Englander and the Corleones’ chief of staff is “German-Irish.”

A honeybee (mirrored from original) A wasp making its nest

Bees make honey, wasps make war –
But only racists would say they’re “different”

The non-European Kosher Nostra, on the other hand, do want to wreck the West, because they’ve never felt part of it and hate its “anti-Semitic” roots. They’ve gone a long way to achieving their goal by opening America’s and Britain’s borders and letting more wasps swarm in to steal the honey created by those mild-mannered northern European bees. If you want to understand how Mexicans in the US and Muslims in the UK are following the footsteps – or wingbeats – of previous exo-ethnic gangs, Mario Puzo’s The Godfather is an excellent place to start. The book also offers important insights into Jews, the biggest gangsters of all, and though it doesn’t offer any explicit remedies for a northern bee-society under alien wasp-attack, the remedies should be obvious. The northern bees will have to sharpen their stings and start using them hard, or the honey they’ve created will be drained to the last drop.


Click here for O’Farrell archive